top of page

Planning the Alternative Professional Learning

Key Components Based on 5 Principles of Effective PD

Ongoing and Sustained Learning

This professional development will run throughout the school year, including monthly CTE PLC sessions and quarterly workshops, allowing teachers time to learn, implement, and refine new collaboration strategies.

Support During Implementation

CTE teacher leaders and instructional coaches will provide ongoing coaching, peer feedback, and classroom visits to help teachers address challenges while applying new collaborative practices.

Active, Engaged Learning

In this PD, teachers will actively engage in designing projects across subjects, participating in hands-on workshops, and will work together using tools like feedback and collaborative lesson planning, instead of just sitting through a presentation.

Modeling

Teacher leaders will model co-planning, co-teaching, and project implementation within their classrooms and through video exemplars during PD sessions to demonstrate effective collaboration in practice.

Content Specific Focus

All PD activities will be differentiated by CTE pathways, TEKS, and industry standards to ensure relevance and practical application for teachers in each discipline.

Collaboration

The collaboration strategy for this plan is:​

  • Small teacher teams (3-5) in CTE pathways to plan together.

  • Establish a Consistent Meeting Schedule

  • Work together to plan, observe and refine lessons

  • Provide instructional coaching within PLCs to strengthen teaching methods

​

​

Audience

The intended audience for this alternative professional learning plan includes middle and high school CTE teachers, instructional coaches, directors and campus leaders. The purpose for this alternative professional learning is to encourage teachers from different subject areas to work together more often by sharing ideas, planning lessons, and creating projects that connect to different CTE content areas. This would also help strengthen instructional alignment. This initiative ensures that classroom instruction aligns with curriculum goals, TEKS, and industry standards.

​

​The need for strengthening CTE teacher collaboration models is relevant because teachers need time, structure, and support to move from isolation to integrated, collaborative planning and teaching.

​

​CTE teachers will use this PD to design and implement industry-aligned, student-centered projects that connect their content to academic standards. They will apply  tools like structured feedback and collaborative lesson planning to refine and strengthen their teaching practices. This will help them move from working in isolation to working in teams, increasing student engagement and real-world learning in their classrooms.

Leadership and Roles

The leadership for this professional learning will be:

  • CTE teacher leaders who will model instruction and facilitate team meetings

  • CTE teacher participants who will co-develop and test new teaching approaches, while evaluating effectiveness

  • Admin/Instructional Coaches will provide protected time, monitor progress, support sustainability

  • District CTE Coordinator to align vision, provide PD resources, invite industry partners

Click to Expand Image
Resourcesgraphic.jpg

9 Month Learning PD Model Timeline

Strengthening CTE Teacher Collaboration Models
9 Months (1 School Year) For CTE teachers, coordinators, instructional leaders

   August: Vision and Team Building
       • PD kickoff: Vision for CTE collaboration, norms, and goal setting.
       • Train on PLC protocols (feedback, lesson plan refinement, project pitch).
       • Form Collaboration PLCs by pathway and interest.

    September-October: Building Skills
       • Bi-weekly PLC meetings: Co-plan first industry-aligned projects.
       • Strategy labs for using tuning protocols with peer feedback.
       • Tech training for shared planning tools (Google Drive, Canvas).

    November: Implementation & Reflection
       •Teachers implement co-planned projects.
       • PLCs meet to reflect on student engagement and challenges.
       • Peer observations and informal coaching for feedback.

    December: First Showcase
       • “Collab Showcase” to share project outcomes and lessons learned.
       • Reflection discussions submitted for growth documentation.

    January-February: Deepening Practice
       • Co-plan next cross-curricular, industry-aligned projects.
       • Continue bi-weekly PLC meetings with tuning protocols.
       • Invite industry partners for project feedback.

    March: Mid-Year Reflection & Adjustments
       • PD session to analyze progress, barriers, and adjustments.
       • Share success stories to build momentum.

    April-May: Advanced Collaboration
       • Co-teaching opportunities or cross-class collaboration.
       • PLCs use lesson study cycles to refine instructional practices.
       • Students present projects with industry feedback.

    June: Celebrate and Sustain
       • End-of-year “Collab Showcase” for all PLCs to share progress.
       • Teacher reflections on growth in collaboration and instructional impact.
       • Growth plans for the following year.

Strengthening CTE PLCs Through Collaboration

Strengthening CTE Teacher Collaboration Models
Professional Development Outline

The following is a comprehensive outline for an alternative professional development (PD) plan focused on CTE Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) and strengthening collaboration. This outline aligns with best practices from Darling-Hammond et al. (2017), Fink’s Significant Learning framework, and the goals of innovation-based PD from Gulamhussein, A. (2013).

I. Purpose & Rationale
   • To create a sustainable, collaborative culture among CTE teachers through high-functioning PLCs.
   • To ensure CTE instruction is industry-aligned, interdisciplinary, and rooted in  shared professional growth.
   • Address CTE teachers’ need for structured collaboration, ongoing support, and cross-curricular alignment.

II. Audience
   • CTE teachers (middle and high school)
   • Core content partners (optional integration)
   • CTE department chairs
   • Campus instructional coaches/administrators

III. Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG)
   • By the end of the year, CTE teams will work together to design hands-on, industry-focused learning that builds teacher                       effectiveness, gets students more engaged, and prepares them for careers.

 IV. Instructional Design Framework
   • Fink’s 3 Column Table-Used to guide planning and alignment of learning goals, activities, and assessments
   • Focus on significant learning: foundational knowledge, application, integration, reflection, and personal growth

V. Key Components Based on 5 Principles of Effective PD
   1. Ongoing & Sustained Duration
       • Year-long PD cycle with monthly workshops and bi-weekly PLC sessions
       • Embedded learning in staff meetings, department time, and coaching check-ins

    2. Implementation Support
       • Peer mentors/CTE Collaboration Leads assigned to PLCs
       • Planning time during PD days for lesson integration and refinement
       • Ongoing access to coaching, observation feedback, and lesson tuning protocols

    3. Active, Engaged Learning
       • Teachers participate in strategy labs, lesson design sprints, and gallery walks
       • Co-create real-world projects and reflect in learning logs

        • Use role-play, case studies, and collaborative planning simulations

    4. Modeling Best Practices
       • Live or video-modeled interdisciplinary lessons from CTE leaders
       • Teachers visit or observe peer classrooms with intentional focus
       • Modeling of PLC protocols and collaboration tools

    5. Content-Specific Focus
       • PD grouped by cluster/pathway with time for cross-collaboration
       • Focus on aligning to TEKS, certifications, and industry standards
       • Use real CTE scenarios to solve instructional problems collaboratively

VI. Collaboration Strategy
   • Launch CTE Collaboration Pods (small cross-pathway teacher groups)
   • Use protocols: tuning protocols, design thinking, lesson study
   • Host quarterly “Collab Showcases” to share wins, failures, and insights

VII. Roles & Responsibilities
   CTE Collaboration Leads- Facilitate PLCs, model practices, coach peers

   Admin/Instructional Coaches- Provide protected time, monitor progress, support sustainability
   CTE Teachers- Participate actively, co-design lessons, reflect and revise
   District CTE Coordinator- Align vision, provide PD resources, invite industry partners

VIII. Timeline

Month          Focus                                                       Key Activities
August         Vision & Team Building                           PLC launch, BHAG creation, goal setting
Sept–Oct     Building Skills                                           Strategy labs, peer modeling, project design
Nov–Dec     Implementation/Showcase                    Teach & collect feedback on first projects
Jan–Feb     Deepening Practice                                 Mid-year PLC review, coaching support
Mar             Reflection/Adjustments                          PD session to analyze and build momentum
April-May   Advanced Collaboration                         PLCs use lesson study cycles to refine practices
June           Celebrate and Sustain Collab                 Showcase, growth plans for next year

IX. Resources Needed
   • Collaboration time (embedded in calendar)
   • Stipends/sub coverage for PLC Leads or peer coaching
   • Shared planning tools and templates
   • Access to digital platforms for collaboration (e.g., Google Drive, Canvas)
   • Books/PD texts (e.g., *PLC at Work*, *Creating Cultures of Thinking*)
   • Industry partner involvement or guest speakers

X. Assessment & Reflection
   • Pre/Post self-assessments of collaboration confidence & practices
   • Rubrics for PLC performance (adapted from DuFour's PLC essentials)
   • Lesson artifacts: project plans, student work samples, peer feedback
   • Final reflection or growth plan per teacher/PLC

XII. Format & Sharing
   • Plan formatted in Google Docs or Slides for collaboration and updates
   • Shared through PD hub and included in ePortfolio
   • Revisited quarterly and revised based on teacher feedback

Fink, L. D. (2003). A self-directed guide to designing courses for significant learning. University of Oklahoma. https://www.bu.edu/sph/files/2014/03/www.deefinkandassociates.com_GuidetoCourseDesignAug05.pdf

 

Gulamhussein, A. (2013). Teaching the teachers: Effective professional development in an era of high stakes accountability. Center for Public Education.

http://www.centerforpubliceducation.org/system/files/2013-176_ProfessionalDevelopment.pdf

​

​Goodwin, B. (2015). Does teacher collaboration promote teacher growth? Educational Leadership, 73(4), 82 to 83. http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/dec15/vol73/num04/Does-Teacher-Collaboration-Promote-Teacher-Growth%C2%A2.aspx

​

Harapnuik, D., Thibodeaux, T., Cummings, C. (2018). Choice, ownership, and voice through authentic learning [eBook]. Creative Commons License. http://tilisathibodeaux.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/COVA_eBook_Jan_2018.pdf  

​

Wei, R. C., Darling-Hammond, L., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the U.S. and abroad. National Staff Development Council.

References

Master's in Education Educational Technology Leadership

    Stephanie Scaletta E-Portfolio is an eportfolio designed to showcase classwork and specific projects for a Master's course. The focus is on highlighting skills and demonstrating work through the featured projects. The eportfolio will also include links to EDLD 5389 and EDLD 5318.

Phone

281-507-2426

Email

Contribution to Learning (1).pdf

bottom of page